A course
in English conversation for intermediate level learners was started today. The
number of students who had enrolled for the course was 17. However, there were
14 students present for the first class today. These kinds of study programs
are organized by the Department of Languages and Linguistics, Prince of Songkla
University, Hatyai Campus, for adult learners. The students of this course are
of various age levels and educational backgrounds.
Of the 14
students who were present today, there were three police officers, one
pharmacist, two lecturers working at the faculty of Nursing, PSU, one house
wife, one school student, one accountant, one doctoral student from the faculty
of Agro-industry, PSU, one dietician working at Songklanagarind Hospital, one
undergraduate student from another university, one student handling her own business. As is often the case with low participation of males in education,
there were only 4 male students. Most participants could communicate in the
target language to a certain degree in that they could introduce themselves and
introduce their friends.
Today I assigned
them with the group activity given below:
Would you like to go shopping?
Topics: Dresses, shoes, food items,
department stores, and bargain sale
Functions:
Greeting
people and responding to greetings, asking for help,
offering
help, accepting an offer, giving and
responding to invitations, asking
prices for consumer goods,
asking for discounts, making appointments,
accepting and rejecting
invitations, inquiring about movies, and rejecting
offers politely
Structure: Simple present, requests with
can/may/could, offers with will/would you
like?
Wh-questions/ yes-no questions, conditionals -if you buy two, you
will
get one free
When we do shopping, we buy various items such as food,
vegetables, fruit, dresses, electronics and electrical appliances
The language you may need
I want to buy a shirt /I’m looking for a
shirt
How much is this blouse?
No thanks
Anything else?
Do you have other colors?
This is an imported one
Is this locally made?
Can you give me a discount?
Sorry, we don’t have it at the moment.
It is out of stock.
Do you have a home delivery service?
Roles: A: you B: your
friend C: a salesperson D: a ticketing clerk at a cinema
Role-play
A: Suppose today is Sunday and you are free so you want to go
shopping with one of
your friends in a
department store.
First, call your
friend and ask if he/she is free today and tell that you want to buy a
pair of shoes. So you
would like to go with him/her. If he/she accepts your
invitation, make an
appointment to meet him/her at a designated place and time.
Example: Hello Mai,
are you free today? I want to go shopping with you.
Accepts the
invitation: Yes, definitely, I’d love to.
Rejects invitation:
Oh, sorry, Mew. I’m busy cleaning my room right now. How
about later?
Where would you like
to go shopping?
B: You see your friend waiting for you at the designated place.
Greet him/her and
thank him/her for
coming. Then go for shopping at the place you have chosen
C: You are a salesman at a shoe shop. Greet the customers and
ask if you could help
them. Attend to their
requirement and finish the transaction.
Now you have bought
the shoes and come out of the shop. Your friend suggests
seeing a movie at the
theatre housed in the same shopping center on the 6th floor.
Both of you go to the
theatre and enquires about the film.
D: You are at the ticket counter and someone is enquiring about
the film. Tell him/her
that all the seats
are full and if he/she likes the tickets can be issued for the next
show.
A&B: You both don’t like to wait until the next show so turn
down her request
politely and leave
the shopping center.
What I observed when learners were put into groups and made to
interact with each other within their group is the group dynamics. When one
wants to talk about the nature of effective teaching and learning, one has to
agree with Earl Stevick’s statement which I quote below:
[In a language course] success depends less
on materials, techniques and linguistic analysis, and more on what goes on
inside and between the people *(learners) in the classroom (Stevick, 1984, p.
4). *(bracketed word is mine).
What Stevick states become practically true
if a teacher carefully observes his/her students working together in a group
because group work provides learners with opportunities to negotiate meaning,
expand their language resources, notice how language is used, and take part in
meaningful interpersonal exchange. Given the importance of group dynamics in
language classroom, L2 teachers are encouraged to introduce group activities in
their teaching contexts where learners receive no opportunities to use the
target language outside the classroom.
Cohen (1994, p. 1) defines group work as,
“students working together in a group small enough so that everyone can
participate on a task that has been clearly assigned”. Cohen (1994),
furthermore, observes that learning of language and the improvement of oral
communication in any language teaching context, in bilingual, or for students
of any age who need to improve skills in oral communication, active practice is
essential. Therefore, in order to provide students with opportunities to
practice and use the target language, group work is an effective teaching
technique because students in group work can communicate about their activity
with each other and this kind of
communication involves a number of functions such as asking questions,
explaining, making suggestions, criticizing, listening, agreeing, disagreeing,
or making joint decisions.
Long and Porter (1985) present five pedagogical arguments for the use of
group work in second language learning such as 1. group work increases
language practice opportunities, 2. group work improves the quality of
student talk. 3. group work helps individualize instruction. 4. group work promotes
a positive affective climate in the classroom. 5. group work increases
student motivation. Since these arguments are relevant to the current study, I
examine them in detail. Long and Porter (1985) argue that one of the main
reasons for low achievement by many L2 learners is simply that they do not have enough time to practice the
new language. Therefore, they assert that even though group work cannot provide
each learner with more time to practice entirely, group work can help each
learner to receive a fair amount time for practice the new language compared to
the time each learner is likely to receive in a teacher-led class.
In a teacher-led class, Flanders (1970)
reports that each learner receives 30 seconds as the talk time per lesson in a
class of 30 students in a 50-minute lesson. Concerning the second argument,
Long and Porter point out that a teacher-led class can limit not only the
quantity of talk students can engage in but also its quality because
teacher-led lessons are mostly based on conventionalized variety of
conversations. In other words, a teacher asks a series of known information or
display questions from the students and they answer with one word or two. Long
and Porter maintain that the kind of conversations described above which the
teacher conducts with the learners may not improve the conversational skills
students will need outside the class. To improve the quality of talk, they
suggest that students should do group work in which they sit or stand facing
each other and work together to accomplish a given activity. This argument seemed true for my experimental
students because face to face interaction with each other demanded a response
or attentive behavior when they were working in groups consisting of four or
five students.
The next argument which Long and Porter advanced addresses the potential
of group work that can help individualize instruction. They say that in a given
group of students, there are individual differences in language abilities.
Therefore, students with low proficiency can benefit working with a different
set of materials suited to their proficiency levels thereby avoiding the risk
of boring other students who have high proficiency and need less time to
complete a given activity.
The fourth argument proposed by Long and
Porter concerns a positive affective climate. They agree that students who are
shy or linguistically insecure, experience considerable stress when they learn
a foreign language in a teacher-fronted classroom because the shy students feel
that they must respond accurately and above all quickly to the teacher’s
questions. In contrast to the atmosphere of teacher-fronted instruction, they
argue that a small group of peers provides a relatively intimate setting and, usually,
a more supportive environment in which shy students can develop their foreign
language skills. In other words, small group interaction provides learners with
an opportunity to enjoy freedom from the requirement for accuracy at all costs
and entry into the richer and more intimate relationships with their group
members. A condition of the type described in small group above promotes a
positive affective climate which in turn allows for shy and linguistically
insecure students to develop their aural-oral skills in a given target language.
In
view of the last argument which suggests that group work motivates learners,
Long and Porter admit that group work allows for a greater quantity and richer
variety of language practice which is better adapted to individual needs and
conducted in a more positive affective climate. Students are individually
involved in lessons more often and at a more personal level. For all the reasons
stated above, Long and Porter believe that group work motivates the classroom
learner. In order to support the belief that group work motivates learners,
they provide empirical evidence from several studies. Littlejohn (1983) found
that small-groups in which learners studied independently led to increased motivation to study Spanish
among beginning students while another study
in 1982, Littlejohn reports that learners responding to a questionnaire
reported that they felt less inhibited and freer to speak and make mistakes in the
small group than in the teacher-led class. Similarly, in a study of children's
attitudes to the study of French in an urban British comprehensive school Fitz-Gibbon
and Reay (1982) found that three quarters of the pupils ranked their interest
for French as a school subject.
In addition to the above pedagogical
arguments, Long and Porter (1985) assert that there is a psychological
rationale for group work in second language learning. Referring to psychological rationale for
group work, Long (1977) posits that group work increases the intellectual and
emotional involvement of the individual pupil in learning a foreign language.
He, furthermore, argue that learners with different personal characteristics
such as intelligent, gifted, outgoing, communicative, shy, withdrawn,
extroverted, and introverted can meet and mix, compensating for one another’s
strong points and deficiencies as language learners. What Long (1977) emphasize
concerning the psychological rationale for group work becomes a reality in my
class. Because I notice that students of different personal traits as discussed
above interact together displaying the degree to which they are behaviorally
conditioned. For example, extroverted students are very active and want to
present their role-plays first before the others while shy students wait until
all the groups finish their presentations.
Emphasizing the research findings that
support the quantity of practice stated above, Long and Porter (1985)
illustrate that students receive significantly more individual language
practice opportunities in group work than in lockstep lessons. They also
receive significantly more practice opportunities in non-native/non-native
speaker than in native/non-native speaker dyads (Porter, 1983), and more in
two-way than in one-way tasks (Doughty & Pica, 1984). The view expressed by
Long and Porter (1985), Pica and Doughty (1986) in terms of the practice
opportunities which the students receive in group work can further be supported
from the evidence of my class. I observe that when my students are engaged in
group work, they share ideas, discuss certain issues to reach an agreement
(depending on the task). Furthermore, I have observed that some members assist
others who are not proficient in their groups and some groups seek assistance
from other groups. In addition to the merits of group work as an effective
classroom technique that can be used to help students improve their oral
proficiency in the target language, research has shown that group work can
facilitate error correction (Porter, 1983; Bruton & Samuda, 1980).
Watch this video at
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gh2mzhRRgOY to get an idea of how students practise a given activity before presenting it to the class and watch the next video at